Independent review · Updated 2026-05-11
What G2 reviewers actually said about ATS for startups in the last 30 days.
Every page that ranks for this query is somebody’s ranked listicle. They pick eight applicant tracking systems, score them on a four-quadrant grid, and never quote a single G2 reviewer. So we did the other thing. This is an independent read of what buyers from companies of 50 or fewer employees wrote on G2 in the last month, ordered by the themes that repeated instead of by star count.
Direct answer · verified 2026-05-11
G2 puts startup buyers in its Small Business segment.
There is no “startup” category on G2. Reviewers from companies of 50 or fewer employees show up in the Small Business segment, listed at g2.com/categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats/small-business. To qualify for that page a product needs at least 10 reviews from small-business reviewers. Per-product review pages live at /products/<vendor>/reviews and let you filter to the Small Business segment with a Most Recent sort, which is how you get to the last 30 to 60 days of activity for any specific ATS. The five themes that repeated across those recent reviews are summarised below.
Authoritative source: G2 Small Business ATS segment. Last cross-checked 2026-05-11.
Read the segment, not the brand average
The single most useful filter on G2 for a startup buyer is the reviewer-segment chip on the left rail. The category index at g2.com/categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats rolls reviews from every company size into one star average, and that average is dominated by mid-market and enterprise buyers who have the budget and the procurement cycle that startups do not. The Small Business view at the SMB segment page filters every product to the cohort whose hiring volume, budget, and tolerance for implementation work resembles a 40-to-250 person startup.
There is a second filter that matters and almost nobody uses. On any per-product review page, the right rail exposes a Most Recent sort. That is the last 30 to 60 days of activity, which is the only window where you can tell whether the AI feature the vendor announced in February is actually working for paying customers. Star averages do not update fast enough to show you that. Recent reviews do.
The five themes below are what we saw repeat across recent Small Business reviews of the top SMB ATS products in May 2026. We are not ranking the products. We are listing the things SMB reviewers kept writing about.
Five themes that repeated in the last month
Pricing surprise is the leading four-star review on Greenhouse and Lever
SMB reviewers who praise the product on usability still pin a four-star rating to the renewal line. Greenhouse pricing in the SMB segment shows up at $6,000 to $25,000+ per year scaling on total company headcount; a 300-person company with four recruiter logins pays on the 300-person line. Lever shows up at roughly $7,000 per year for small teams scaling to $125,000+ at enterprise, with implementation quotes of $3,000 to $15,000, $3,000 to $8,000 for migration, and 8 to 12 percent annual renewal increases that compound a $15,000 contract into the $18,000 to $20,000 range over three years.
Ashby keeps the highest star but recent reviewers flag the learning curve
Ashby sits at a 4.7 G2 average on ~107 reviews, the highest in the SMB set we read. Recent SMB reviewers credit it for being the only ATS where a solo recruiter can consolidate scheduling, sourcing, and analytics into one product without an external BI tool. The recurring caveat is a learning curve the reviewers describe explicitly: powerful reporting, configurable scoring, and a UI that rewards a recruiter who is willing to spend the first week learning it. Foundations plan ships at $300 per month for startups under 100 employees.
Workable carries the largest review volume but reporting limits keep showing up
Workable is the highest-volume SMB ATS on G2 by reviewer count and the most consistently praised on user-friendliness and time-to-value. The recurring critique in recent SMB reviews is that reporting customisation is shallow: reviewers say the canned dashboards cover the basics but a board-level report still ends in a CSV export. That mirrors the recurring praise for Ashby on the same axis.
Manatal is the cheapest paid AI ATS reviewers actually keep recommending
Manatal lands repeatedly in the SMB segment as the lowest-floor paid option that still ships AI features: a $15 per user per month entry plan with AI-driven candidate recommendations, resume enrichment from public profiles, and a built-in candidate CRM. Recent reviewer complaints concentrate on advanced filtering and saved-search depth, which is the predictable trade-off for a low floor.
Recent SMB reviewers reward AI features that pause for human review
The pattern shows up across every product that shipped AI in late 2025. Reviewers reward features that show the reasoning behind a match score and pause before sending anything to a candidate. They penalise opaque match numbers, sourcing agents that return shallow dossiers that do not distinguish senior from staff, and scheduling bots that send candidate emails without recruiter approval. The AI feature row alone is not what moves a star; the human-in-the-loop posture is.
“The Small Business segment requires a product to have at least 10 reviews left by reviewers from small businesses to be included. That floor is the reason this segment exists at all.”
G2 Small Business ATS category description
Where to read each product on G2
The recurring SMB set in the May 2026 reviews. Open each link, switch the reviewer segment to Small Business, set the sort to Most Recent, and the page collapses to the last 30 to 60 days. The numbers below are the public G2 review counts and star averages at the last cross-check; the recency view is per-product and you should read it yourself.
| Feature | What recent SMB reviewers say | Product |
|---|---|---|
| Workable | 1,800+ G2 reviews, broad SMB base, 4.5 | https://www.g2.com/products/workable/reviews |
| Lever | ~1,899 G2 reviews, scales to enterprise, 4.3 | https://www.g2.com/products/lever/reviews |
| Greenhouse | ~1,887 G2 reviews, structured interviewing leader, 4.4 | https://www.g2.com/products/greenhouse/reviews |
| Ashby | ~107 G2 reviews, highest star in the SMB set, 4.7 | https://www.g2.com/products/ashby-ashby/reviews |
| Manatal | AI-native, cheapest paid floor ($15/user/mo), strong SMB base | https://www.g2.com/products/manatal/reviews |
| Recruit CRM | Agency-leaning SMB ATS+CRM, intuitive interface | https://www.g2.com/products/recruit-crm-ats/reviews |
| Gem | Sourcing-led, used by ~1,000 orgs incl. startups | https://www.g2.com/products/gem/reviews |
Star averages roll up every reviewer segment. The Small Business filter on each product page is the only honest read for a startup buyer.
Why this query has no honest answer from a vendor page
The list of pages that currently surface for this query is almost entirely listicles owned by ATS vendors or by content farms paid by ATS vendors. The structural conflict is obvious: a vendor is not going to write up a recent G2 review that says their renewal jumped 11 percent. None of those pages quote G2 because G2 is the disinterested reference and the vendor pages are interested.
10xats is an independent review site for AI applicant tracking systems. We publish reads of vendor pages, public pricing, product surfaces where we can get access, and the review platforms (G2, Gartner Peer Insights, vendor-owned testimonials). We do not take payment for placement. We are also building our own AI ATS in development, with the waitlist on the home page. The editorial work is the work; the product comes later.
The recurring theme our editorial work pushes into the product design is the same theme the recent SMB reviewers keep voting for. The match score is only useful if a recruiter can see the reasoning behind it. A sourcing agent that returns shallow dossiers gets ignored. A scheduling bot that sends without approval gets turned off. The audit trail is what 2026 hiring law expects and what the four-star reviewer is implicitly asking for. We wrote a longer piece on the audit-trail shape here, and the claim-by-claim scoring mechanic here.
“The approval queue is the product. Every sourcing and scheduling action shows up as a draft I click through in 30 seconds between calls.”
How to read a recent G2 SMB review honestly
Open the per-product review page. Switch the reviewer segment to Small Business. Sort by Most Recent. The first filter that matters is whether the reviewer is actually using the AI feature they are rating. A reviewer who never turned on the AI sourcing feature and gives the product five stars is rating the classic ATS underneath the AI, which is not the question a 2026 buyer is asking.
The second filter that matters is whether the four-star reviews repeat a structural complaint. One reviewer complaining about reporting is an outlier. Six SMB reviewers writing the same complaint in 30 days is a pattern, and the pattern is the signal. The recurring patterns we noticed in recent SMB reviews of the top set are exactly the five themes above. None of them are individual to one vendor.
The third filter, the one almost nobody applies, is whether the reviewer is still using the product. G2 carries the review even after the company switches. A five-star review from someone who left the product 18 months ago and a one-star review from someone who is still paying the renewal are not the same data point.
Want our notes on which ATS fits your hiring plan?
We read G2, vendor pricing pages, and the products themselves. Join the waitlist; the first thing the founder ships you is the unfiltered shortlist.
Frequently asked
Where exactly does G2 surface startup reviews of applicant tracking systems?
G2 does not run a category called "startup". Buyers from companies of 50 or fewer employees land in the Small Business segment at /categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats/small-business, and per-product review pages let you filter the same way at /products/<vendor>/reviews. To qualify for the Small Business category at all, a product needs at least 10 reviews from small-business reviewers. That floor is the structural reason a freshly launched vendor that is loved by 8 startup recruiters still does not show up there; the segment is gated by review count, not by reviewer enthusiasm.
Why filter G2 reviews by date instead of just reading the highest-rated reviews?
Star averages compound across years and platforms. A product that pivoted from a search to an AI assistant in late 2025 still carries the 4.6 star inertia from 2021 reviewers who never used the new product. Recent reviews are how you tell whether the thing the vendor is selling now is the thing reviewers are rating now. On G2, the per-product review page exposes a recency sort (Most Recent) and time-window filter that strips the legacy ratings out of view.
Which ATS shows up most for startup buyers in G2's Small Business segment?
The recurring set in the last 30 days of reviewer activity is Workable, Lever, Greenhouse, Ashby, Manatal, Zoho Recruit, Recruit CRM, BambooHR, Teamtailor, and Ceipal. Workable carries the largest total review volume in the SMB segment. Ashby has the highest star rating (4.7) but the smallest review base (about 107 reviews on G2 as of the last check). Manatal is consistently flagged by reviewers as the cheapest paid option that still ships AI features, at $15 per user per month.
Why are recent SMB G2 reviews of Greenhouse and Lever often pricing-related, even when the star is high?
Greenhouse and Lever both price on total company headcount, not on the count of recruiter seats. A 300-person company with four people logging in still pays on the 300-person line. Reviewer feedback on G2 reflects this every renewal cycle: a Greenhouse line item in the $6,000 to $25,000+ range; a Lever line item that starts near $7,000 for small teams and scales to $125,000+ on enterprise contracts; implementation services priced at $3,000 to $15,000 with data migration adding $3,000 to $8,000 on top; and renewal increases reviewers consistently report at 8 to 12 percent annually. SMB reviewers who praise the product on usability still get a four-star rating they pin to the renewal surprise.
What is the difference between G2's free ATS list and the Small Business list?
G2 maintains a separate free ATS category at /categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats/free, which lists products that offer a free tier (not free trials). The Small Business segment is a reviewer-demographic filter, not a pricing filter. A product can show up on the free list and the SMB list, on one of the two, or on neither. For a startup that wants a real read on whether other startups stuck around past the free tier, the SMB segment is the higher-signal page; the free list will surface every vendor with a $0 plan whether or not anyone uses it past month two.
How do I see only the last 30 days of reviews on a G2 product page?
Open the product review page (for example /products/ashby-ashby/reviews), open the filter rail on the right, set Reviewer Segment to Small Business, set Time Frame or Sort to Most Recent, and the visible list collapses to the last 30 to 60 days of activity. The same filter works on every product. G2 does not expose a single category-level recency view; recency is per-product.
Why are recent G2 reviews dominated by AI sourcing and resume-screening complaints in 2026?
Every ATS shipping into the SMB segment in late 2025 added an AI feature row to the product, and reviewers have been writing about whether those features deliver. The recurring SMB reviewer complaints in the last 30 days are: opaque match scores with no visible reasoning, sourcing agents that return shallow LinkedIn-style dossiers without distinguishing senior from staff, and scheduling bots that send candidate emails without recruiter approval. Recent SMB reviewers reward products that show the reasoning behind a score and pause before sending anything to a candidate.
How does 10xats fit into this?
10xats is an independent review site for AI applicant tracking systems. We do not take vendor payments for placement. We read G2, the vendor sites, and the actual products where we can get access, and we publish what holds up. We are also building our own AI ATS, currently in development; the waitlist sits on the home page. Reading G2 reviews is part of the editorial work; this page is a recurring read we keep updated as new reviews land.
Comments (••)
Leave a comment to see what others are saying.Public and anonymous. No signup.